Choose simultaneous ring for speed
Use it when every configured recipient can handle the same call and shared ringing is acceptable.
Call-routing comparison
Simultaneous ring calls every configured destination at once, while round robin tries destinations in sequence. The choice depends on whether the priority is the fastest available answer or a more orderly distribution of interruptions.
No credit card required. The trial uses a shared line with a PIN.
Neither method guarantees an answer. The difference is how each live-answer attempt reaches the team.
| Factor | Simultaneous ring | Round robin |
|---|---|---|
| Call delivery | Rings configured phones together. | Tries configured phones sequentially. |
| Best fit | Small groups where anyone can handle the call. | Teams that want a defined distribution order. |
| Main trade-off | More people are interrupted. | The caller may wait through several attempts. |
| Who answers | The first person to pick up. | The first person in the sequence who answers. |
| Recorder support | Included with smart call routing. | Sequential and randomized options with smart call routing. |
Call speed and team focus pull in different directions.
Use it when every configured recipient can handle the same call and shared ringing is acceptable.
Use it when calls should reach one destination at a time and first attempts should rotate.
Check how long sequential attempts take before voicemail and shorten the path if callers wait too long.
These distribution methods are not full contact-centre logic.
Recorder does not route by department, expertise, customer record, or detected intent.
Recorder does not provide queue positions, queue callbacks, or agent status management.
Recorder includes both methods on Team.
Try the complete inbound call flow for 7 days without a credit card.